commit bbbf0f7cbfe986af56a5ed89a6ec8992799f084a parent 3b5ead96ea94ef5ac56fb25e0fbb6e82527506c5 Author: Andrew Laack <andrew@laack.co> Date: Sun, 3 May 2026 13:26:58 -0500 Starting writing about search summarization Diffstat:
| A | posts/wip/the-legality-of-summarization.md | | | 6 | ++++++ |
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/posts/wip/the-legality-of-summarization.md b/posts/wip/the-legality-of-summarization.md @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# The Legality of Summarization + +Warning: Discussion of AI Content +Note: AI has **not** been used in the writing process, but I dislike reading things that discuss AI so be warned, this will discuss AI and related concepts. + +There have been prior court cases around using snippets of indexed web content in search engines, to set precendents about their usage wrt copyright holders. Given that these snippets don't impact the authors by subverting earnings potential, they were deemed acceptable. Does this precedent still apply for AI summaries?